Love at first sight is not love. But yes, it is indeed a feeling that can grow into love. And if it does so, only then is the phrase â€œlove at first sightâ€ justified. I told itâ€™s a feeling that can grow into love but not love itself. Is there a name for this feeling? […]
Love at first sight is not love. But yes, it is indeed a feeling that can grow into love. And if it does so, only then is the phrase â€œlove at first sightâ€ justified.
I told itâ€™s a feeling that can grow into love but not love itself. Is there a name for this feeling? Sure. Itâ€™s called infatuation. At first sight all you get is attracted. If you are a believer in love at first site, you would take infatuation for love so unknowingly. If you are a non believer you would know itâ€™s not love. Immaterial of who you are, the fact is that this infatuation can grow into love in some time. In how much time? I cannot answer that. Can anyone?
When I say this infatuation CAN grow into love I mean to say that it doesnâ€™t always grow into love. Following all kinds of path, this feeling which erupts at first sight may either die or transform into something else or the best of all turn into true love. The path this feeling follows is dependent on so many things. To start with, it depends on whether you are a believer in the philosophy of love at first sight or not. How? Read on.
There are two possibilities that exist if you are a believer in the philosophy of love at first sight.
If you are a believer, it will take relatively more time for you to realize that your feeling is not at all love. This happens only when things donâ€™t go fine with your belief. When you happen to interact with the object of your affection and â€˜somethingâ€™ tells you things are not going to work out. You start getting closer to reality. But you do that slowly, at a brisk pace. This â€˜somethingâ€™ is a weak feeling and the well disguised strong attraction still appears to be nothing else but love. Finally there comes a time, it sure comes, when you have no doubt that itâ€™s not love. Love was never there. And the instant this feeling comes, you have transformed into a non believer. Itâ€™s good and itâ€™s bad too. Itâ€™s good because you realized that love at first sight never existed. Itâ€™s bad because your attraction failed to grow into love.
The second possibility is that, if you are a believer it might so happen that you never realize the fact that you are not actually in love. You might always hold this view that it was indeed love at first sight. You might never realize the transformation of the feeling of attraction into that of pure love. But then how does that matter? If at the end of the day you are in true love, whatever you assumed in the beginning will look alright to you.
There is no meter that can confirm whether you are in love or not at any point of time. So if you think that you are in love, itâ€™s impossible for anyone to convince you otherwise. But irrespective of your understanding of your feelings, the fact remains that at first sight it is attraction and nothing else. A believer realizes this only when at some point of time, the attraction goes. The same believer never realizes this if that attraction never goes and indeed it transforms into true love after interacting with the subject and after some time.
Now let me talk about the non believers. They can be talked about in three sets. Let the first set consist of those whose feelings die in some time. They reassure themselves that they were correct in rejecting the idea of love at first sight. For these people they do not get the chance to deviate from truth. This will become clear when you consider the other two sets of non believers.
The second and third set deals with those whose feelings grow into love. One set of persons would conclude that they were fools when they didnâ€™t believe in the philosophy of love at first sight. They would think they were wrong earlier when the truth is that they think the wrong way now. The third set would realize that though it was not love at first sight, it grew into love with time and interaction. These men/women are capable of seeing the transformation. They saw their attraction grow into love. Earlier I had stated that the first set never got a chance to deviate from truth. I guess thatâ€™s clear now. This last set has the option to believe like the second set, but they do not deviate from truth like them. They have the option to think like the second set; think things which are not actually true. These people are the ones who understand the world the best way. They see the truth. They can never be blinded to think that love at first sight exists.